From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/37754 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Menubars (Was: MML menu in message-mode is poorly named) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 17:43:09 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87vgjs7p6x.fsf@inanna.rimspace.net> <20010813092043.A31820@socha.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035173114 15485 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:05:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:05:14 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 27662 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2001 15:44:07 -0000 Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42) by gnus.org with SMTP; 13 Aug 2001 15:44:07 -0000 Original-Received: from lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.19.67]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de with ESMTP id RAA06789 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 17:43:10 +0200 (MES) Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.19.80]) by lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de id RAA18854; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 17:43:09 +0200 (MET DST) Original-Received: (from grossjoh@localhost) by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id RAA06685; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 17:43:09 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: <20010813092043.A31820@socha.net> ("Robin S. Socha"'s message of "Mon, 13 Aug 2001 09:20:43 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.105 Original-Lines: 18 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37754 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37754 "Robin S. Socha" writes: > Sometimes I wonder if a proper "Gnus only" toolbar would be a Good > Thing. And while staring in awe at my own screenshot, I wonder if the > modeline-thingy for the tree frame should not have a different label. > Ummmmm... Yup. Yeah, like W3 does it. But on the other hand, while the own menu bar might be nice for the group and summary buffers, I think that it might not be such a good idea for the message buffers. These are mostly normal text-entry buffers, so all the normal menus apply there, too. (Well, maybe not the VC one...) kai -- ~/.signature: No such file or directory