From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36443
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Sender header?
Date: 26 May 2001 00:04:00 +0200
Message-ID: <vafpucx2ii7.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
References: <vafg0dwrpyh.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<01May23.141128edt.115245@gateway.intersys.com>
	<vaf3d9uq4c4.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<01May24.115917edt.115250@gateway.intersys.com>
	<vafsnhuk8t2.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<01May24.143521edt.115214@gateway.intersys.com>
	<m3r8xeh8qw.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu>
	<01May24.153439edt.115213@gateway.intersys.com>
	<m3itiqh6by.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu>
	<01May24.163305edt.115259@gateway.intersys.com>
	<vafitiqjr4w.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<m3zoc21a46.fsf@peorth.gweep.net> <m3bsohfpe7.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu>
	<01May25.161238edt.115273@gateway.intersys.com>
	<m31ypdcgds.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035172026 8606 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:47:06 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:47:06 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@gnus.org>
Original-Received: (qmail 20535 invoked by alias); 25 May 2001 22:04:28 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 20530 invoked from network); 25 May 2001 22:04:28 -0000
Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 25 May 2001 22:04:28 -0000
Original-Received: from marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.159]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de  with ESMTP id AAA00142 for <ding@gnus.org>; Sat, 26 May 2001 00:04:01 +0200 (MES)
Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.20.160])
	by marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de id AAA20474; Sat, 26 May 2001 00:04:00 +0200 (MET DST)
Original-Received: (from grossjoh@localhost)
	by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id AAA15669;
	Sat, 26 May 2001 00:04:00 +0200
X-Face: 6=pZ4hVbjN:C?j1$h/-bi4:F%*~B#Rxb$[0%!{5NK"dE:_QRAM]Dzl=$yMu%Rh4xCSm/#>!
 $n%@SHJ](K<taDos\M;zw#b7gIc01F@'f{.guD~];wV{#\SX0YlGR6fREpYY>FJKL,uF\=G=bRJQC$
 ?+Dlxu*pj.Z,-GK<~y7sd/l*PN\]>}<oCe5vw:p#\Gsv#E(:`3Jl2*()0,/H
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: <m31ypdcgds.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu> (prj@po.cwru.edu's message of "25 May 2001 16:39:21 -0400")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.104
Original-Lines: 20
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36443
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36443

On 25 May 2001, Paul Jarc wrote:

> I see nothing in 2822 to suggest that Sender should indicate the
> host where a message originated.  If you do, please point it out.

My idea of Rat's reasoning: Sender should be canonical, canonical
means login@fully.qualified.host.name.  Qed.

(Maybe there's an additional step `Sender should be verified, verified
means canonical' in the beginning.)

Right, Rat? ;-)

I doubt that he will quote chapter and verse to show that verified
means canonical, or that Sender should be canonical.  That just
follows from common sense.  Or 30 years of practice.

kai
-- 
~/.signature: No such file or directory