From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36302 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: [Q] primary / secondary methods differences Date: 22 May 2001 13:15:29 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171910 7882 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:45:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:45:10 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 25992 invoked by alias); 22 May 2001 11:15:57 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 25987 invoked from network); 22 May 2001 11:15:56 -0000 Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42) by gnus.org with SMTP; 22 May 2001 11:15:56 -0000 Original-Received: from marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.159]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de with ESMTP id NAA26920 for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 13:15:29 +0200 (MES) Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.20.160]) by marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de id NAA04131; Tue, 22 May 2001 13:15:29 +0200 (MET DST) Original-Received: (from grossjoh@localhost) by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id NAA16259; Tue, 22 May 2001 13:15:29 +0200 X-Face: 6=pZ4hVbjN:C?j1$h/-bi4:F%*~B#Rxb$[0%!{5NK"dE:_QRAM]Dzl=$yMu%Rh4xCSm/#>! $n%@SHJ](KFJKL,uF\=G=bRJQC$ ?+Dlxu*pj.Z,-GK<~y7sd/l*PN\]>} In-Reply-To: (Didier Verna's message of "22 May 2001 12:10:29 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.104 Original-Lines: 18 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36302 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36302 On 22 May 2001, Didier Verna wrote: > Out of curiosity, does anybody know if the primary method > and the secondary ones behave exactly the same way > (specification syntax, behavior etc). Like, are there people > using the primary for mails and stuff like that. If you can do (add-to-list 'gnus-secondary-select-methods FOO), then you can also do (setq gnus-select-method FOO), and vice versa. Was this what you meant? Of course, primary and secondary methods do not work in the same way: when displaying groups, the prefix is omitted for primary (native) groups. kai -- ~/.signature: No such file or directory