From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/35292 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Oddity with mail Date: 10 Mar 2001 19:41:57 +0100 Message-ID: References: <864rx2qatn.fsf@duchess.twilley.org> <86g0glpn5a.fsf@duchess.twilley.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171058 2171 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:30:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:30:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 25811 invoked by alias); 10 Mar 2001 18:42:22 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 25806 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2001 18:42:22 -0000 Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42) by gnus.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2001 18:42:22 -0000 Original-Received: from marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.159]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de with ESMTP id TAA26355; Sat, 10 Mar 2001 19:42:02 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.20.160]) by marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de id TAA03780; Sat, 10 Mar 2001 19:42:02 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: (from grossjoh@localhost) by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id TAA02728; Sat, 10 Mar 2001 19:42:02 +0100 X-Face: 6=pZ4hVbjN:C?j1$h/-bi4:F%*~B#Rxb$[0%!{5NK"dE:_QRAM]Dzl=$yMu%Rh4xCSm/#>! $n%@SHJ](KFJKL,uF\=G=bRJQC$ ?+Dlxu*pj.Z,-GK<~y7sd/l*PN\]>} In-Reply-To: <86g0glpn5a.fsf@duchess.twilley.org> (Jack Twilley's message of "10 Mar 2001 09:08:33 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0.01) Emacs/21.0.99 Original-Lines: 15 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:35292 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:35292 On 10 Mar 2001, Jack Twilley wrote: > How do I capture what Gnus is sending to this process? With M-x debug-on-entry RET message-send-mail-with-sendmail RET, I guess. Maybe putting point inside that defun and then doing M-x edebug-defun RET is a more user-friendly way. You just single-step through the function until you see that it's about to invoke sendmail. Then you look at the buffer that's to be sent to the process. kai -- Be indiscrete. Do it continuously.