From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/19566 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: MIME and mailcrypt Date: 03 Dec 1998 11:38:43 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035157893 12279 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:51:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:51:33 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (gizmo.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.102.31]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA24433 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 05:40:09 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@sina.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.3.5]) by gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAA18793; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 04:39:22 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 03 Dec 1998 04:39:13 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id EAA12852 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 04:39:05 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.4.42]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA24414 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 05:38:56 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from ramses.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (ramses.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.180]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de with SMTP id LAA01236 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 11:38:46 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: (grossjoh@localhost) by ramses.informatik.uni-dortmund.de id LAA24893; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 11:38:43 +0100 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Stainless Steel Rat's message of "02 Dec 1998 20:43:54 -0500" User-Agent: Gnus/5.070061 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.61) Emacs/20.3 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Original-Lines: 18 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:19566 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:19566 Stainless Steel Rat writes: > Least serious but most problematic is signing vs. signing and > encrypting vs. doing nothing at all. For example, most of the > time I sign, sometimes I sign and encrypt, and occasionally I do > neither. Mailcrypt cannot be totally automated. Not to mention > that this would require a radical change in how mailcrypt users > use mailcrypt. I didn't say that mailcrypt should decide all by itself. I suggested the following: Users type C-c / s to sign and/or C-c / e to encrypt, but mailcrypt doesn't do it immediately, it only remembers to do it later, from message-send-hook. kai -- This gubblick contains many nonsklarkish English flutzpahs, but the overall pluggandisp can be glorked from context. -- David Moser