From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/37244 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: spurious subject change (was: problem with gnus-summary-line-format.) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 00:02:04 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87ae1o4r0h.fsf@smarttrust.com> <873d7g4ope.fsf@smarttrust.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035172693 12874 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:58:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:58:13 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 17862 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2001 22:02:36 -0000 Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42) by gnus.org with SMTP; 29 Jul 2001 22:02:36 -0000 Original-Received: from lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.19.67]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de with ESMTP id AAA15166 for ; Mon, 30 Jul 2001 00:02:05 +0200 (MES) Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.19.80]) by lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de id AAA04390; Mon, 30 Jul 2001 00:02:05 +0200 (MET DST) Original-Received: (from grossjoh@localhost) by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id AAA06908; Mon, 30 Jul 2001 00:02:04 +0200 Original-To: ding list In-Reply-To: (Maciej Matysiak's message of "Sun, 29 Jul 2001 23:08:09 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.105 Original-Lines: 19 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37244 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37244 On Sun, 29 Jul 2001, Maciej Matysiak wrote: > On the 29th of July 2001 at 23:01, > Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Gro=DFjohann) wrote: >=20 >> But when the subject changes, that feature won't do the right >> thing. >=20 > oh. for me, it's a feature :) at least, now i see just the thread, > without the-bat-borked subjects (re[7]: blah) and subjects with > polish characters malformed by readers who can't quote properly. I see. Hm. Okay, I'm happy then. But I think the feature should still be changed so that there is a user option to insert the subject even inside a thread when the subject has changed. kai --=20 ~/.signature: No such file or directory