From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/24747
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Comparing mail backends
Date: 22 Aug 1999 14:38:54 +0200
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <vafr9kwkn1d.fsf@petty.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035162260 10427 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:04:20 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:04:20 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA00757
	for <jason@mailhost.sclp.com>; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 08:43:45 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAB18645;
	Sun, 22 Aug 1999 07:40:07 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sun, 22 Aug 1999 07:40:26 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA29160
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 07:40:18 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.4.42])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA00696
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 08:39:26 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from petty.cs.uni-dortmund.de (petty.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.161]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de  with ESMTP id OAA24931 for <ding@gnus.org>; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 14:38:55 +0200 (MES)
Original-Received: (grossjoh@localhost)
	by petty.cs.uni-dortmund.de id OAA03937; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 14:38:54 +0200 (MET DST)
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
Original-Lines: 36
User-Agent: Gnus/5.070095 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.95) Emacs/20.4
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:24747
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:24747

Each kind of mail backend has its own advantages and disadvantages.
Here, I'd like to learn something about speed.

Which operations are particularly slow and which operations are
particularly fast for the following backends?

  - nnmbox
  - nnbabyl
  - nnfolder
  - nnmh
  - nnml

Operations I'm thinking of:

  - Mail splitting.
  - `B c' and `B m' within a server.
  - Entering a group (ie, fetching headers).
  - Searching in a group with `M-s'.
  - Checking all groups when Gnus is started.  (I'm not sure what
    happens here, but I think at least the number of unread messages
    in each group needs to be computed.)

Feel free to add operations which I haven't thought of.

Of the above, I know nnml best, and I have seen a bit of nnfolder and
nnmh.  But I don't know how nnfolder and nnml compare when moving
messages between groups -- which one is faster?  I think fetching
headers is fastest in nnml, then comes nnfolder, and then nnmh.  Is
this correct?  nnmh seems to be very slow when Gnus is started, at
least compared with nnml; but how does nnfolder come in?

And I have no idea whatsoever about nnmbox and nnbabyl.

kai
-- 
I like BOTH kinds of music.