From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/22253
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: bad (i.e. serious) mail problems
Date: 03 Apr 1999 12:04:52 +0200
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <vafr9q2vx2z.fsf@ramses.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
References: <uogmk7k9g.fsf@home.com> <ur9r9ywni.fsf@rsn.hp.com> <m3bticc4k3.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org> <uu2w3g9k0.fsf@rsn.hp.com> <m34so2831w.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org> <u90dd9o4s.fsf@rsn.hp.com> <uzp5t80lc.fsf@rsn.hp.com> <m3emn5yo6m.fsf@reader.newsguy.com> <m3d825naet.fsf@readymix.joyful.com> <wkyaktwfbb.fsf@rsn.hp.com> <m3pv5tskko.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org> <uemm9xyxi.fsf@home.com> <m3g16nrdo7.fsf@peorth.gweep.net> <ur9q7vixx.fsf@apexsc.com> <99Mar30.101000est.13914-3@gateway.intersys.com> <u3e2mnbt5.fsf@home.com> <m34sn2jyam.fsf@peorth.gweep.net> <u7lryjw4s.fsf@home.com> <m3677iigv0.fsf@peorth.gweep.net> <vaf7lrx25wo.fsf@ramses.cs.uni-dortmund.de> <99Mar31.100918est.13949-3@gateway.intersys.com> <w4aewtfx4w.fsf@kline-station.ckdhr.com> <m3ogl98kj8.fsf@peorth.gweep.net> <w4bth9ic94.fsf@kline-station.ckdhr.com> <vafpv5od79a.fsf@ramses.cs.uni-dortmund.de> <99Apr1.170300est.13874-3@gateway.intersys.com> <vafwvzvxr4l.fsf@ramses.cs.uni-dortmund.de> <99Apr2.124830est.13869-2@gateway.inters!
 
 ys.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035160207 27606 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:30:07 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:30:07 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA18512
	for <jason@mailhost.sclp.com>; Sat, 3 Apr 1999 05:05:58 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAB15521;
	Sat, 3 Apr 1999 04:05:17 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 03 Apr 1999 04:05:45 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id EAA11743 for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Sat, 3 Apr 1999 04:05:34 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.4.42])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA18444
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Sat, 3 Apr 1999 05:05:26 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: from ramses.cs.uni-dortmund.de (ramses.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.180]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de  with SMTP id LAA16567 for <ding@gnus.org>; Sat, 3 Apr 1999 11:04:53 +0100 (MET)
Original-Received: (grossjoh@localhost)
	by ramses.cs.uni-dortmund.de id MAA03159; Sat, 3 Apr 1999 12:04:52 +0200
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: Stainless Steel Rat's message of "Fri, 2 Apr 1999 12:51:54 -0500"
Original-Lines: 12
User-Agent: Gnus/5.07008 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.80) Emacs/20.3
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:22253
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:22253

Stainless Steel Rat <ratinox@peorth.gweep.net> writes:

  > Is generating a Content-Length header if one does not exist a bad idea?

I think it's a wonderful idea!  Can't imagine what would go wrong with
that.  I'm not sure if all Emacs mail clients grok the header,
though.  Hm.  I guess mh-e has its own POP mechanism (the MH one),
right?  So we're left with mew, VM, Rmail and Gnus.  I think.

kai
-- 
Abort this operation?   [Abort]  [Cancel]