From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/38396
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: nnimap: Checking mailbox foo
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 11:56:01 +0200
Message-ID: <vafsnec1pam.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108281051550.26321-100000@lie.extundo.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035174266 22189 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:24:26 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:24:26 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <grossjoh@ls6.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
Return-Path: <grossjoh@ls6.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
Original-Received: (qmail 4495 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2001 09:56:32 -0000
Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 28 Aug 2001 09:56:32 -0000
Original-Received: from lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.19.67]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de  with ESMTP id LAA26542 for <ding@gnus.org>; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 11:56:04 +0200 (MES)
Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.19.80])
	by lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de id LAA27250; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 11:56:03 +0200 (MET DST)
Original-Received: by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix, from userid 6104)
	id 9813F206B; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 11:56:01 +0200 (CEST)
Original-To: <ding@gnus.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108281051550.26321-100000@lie.extundo.com>
 (Simon Josefsson's message of "Tue, 28 Aug 2001 10:54:43 +0200 (CEST)")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.105
Original-Lines: 18
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38396
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38396

Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com> writes:

> On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Kai Gro=DFjohann wrote:
>
>> What could be the data that IMAP can deliver faster?
>
> Most things except highest and lowest article number in the group:

Hm.  Interesting.  Maybe what's really desired, then, is to change the
backend interface such that the low/high numbers aren't used if the
number of unread extra information is provided?

Of course, that seems more extensive than the previous change that I
suggested.

kai
--=20
Symbol's function definition is void: signature