From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/35948 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Gnus ideas: little ones Date: 19 Apr 2001 18:02:17 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171616 5916 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:40:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:40:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 24553 invoked by alias); 19 Apr 2001 16:02:41 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 24548 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2001 16:02:40 -0000 Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42) by gnus.org with SMTP; 19 Apr 2001 16:02:40 -0000 Original-Received: from marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.159]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de with ESMTP id SAA28638; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 18:02:18 +0200 (MES) Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.20.160]) by marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de id SAA00507; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 18:02:18 +0200 (MET DST) Original-Received: (from grossjoh@localhost) by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id SAA13652; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 18:02:17 +0200 X-Face: 6=pZ4hVbjN:C?j1$h/-bi4:F%*~B#Rxb$[0%!{5NK"dE:_QRAM]Dzl=$yMu%Rh4xCSm/#>! $n%@SHJ](KFJKL,uF\=G=bRJQC$ ?+Dlxu*pj.Z,-GK<~y7sd/l*PN\]>} In-Reply-To: (Per Abrahamsen's message of "19 Apr 2001 17:05:17 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090003 (Oort Gnus v0.03) Emacs/21.0.103 Original-Lines: 21 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:35948 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:35948 On 19 Apr 2001, Per Abrahamsen wrote: > Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Gro=DFjohann) writes: >=20 >> There should be a command for moving all the addresses from the Cc >> header to the To header, or vice versa. >=20 > Eh, is 'C-a C-d C-d T o' really that hard to type? Not really. But what if you already have a To header with addresses in it? Of course, it works to have more than one To header, it's only a little ugly. Okay, this is just a nicety. More useful, actually, might be the kill-address command. Or maybe even `move this address to the To header'. kai --=20 The passive voice should never be used.