From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/34677 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: SMTP question (not quite Gnus-related) Date: 09 Feb 2001 13:09:16 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <87y9vujkvd.fsf@torus.tenzing.com> <87lmrij8e2.fsf@inanna.rimspace.net> <8766imnfa9.fsf@torus.tenzing.com> <874ry6j5i7.fsf@inanna.rimspace.net> <87pugtm754.fsf@torus.tenzing.com> <878znhm4rw.fsf@torus.tenzing.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035170558 31594 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:22:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:22:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 567EFD049D for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 07:10:13 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAC04886; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 06:09:50 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 09 Feb 2001 06:09:10 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged)) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA27026 for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 06:08:57 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.4.42]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6205D049D for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 07:09:26 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.159]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de with ESMTP id NAA12828; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 13:09:22 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.20.160]) by marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de id NAA09881; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 13:09:22 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: (from grossjoh@localhost) by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id NAA24529; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 13:09:21 +0100 X-Face: 6=pZ4hVbjN:C?j1$h/-bi4:F%*~B#Rxb$[0%!{5NK"dE:_QRAM]Dzl=$yMu%Rh4xCSm/#>! $n%@SHJ](KFJKL,uF\=G=bRJQC$ ?+Dlxu*pj.Z,-GK<~y7sd/l*PN\]>} In-Reply-To: <878znhm4rw.fsf@torus.tenzing.com> ("Steven E. Harris"'s message of "08 Feb 2001 10:02:59 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0.01) Emacs/21.0.98 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Original-Lines: 15 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:34677 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:34677 On 08 Feb 2001, Steven E. Harris wrote: > This is maddening! If the first if part of the body (don't > get me wrong - I like the idea), then they should not define the > *terminator* to be ".." They should say something more > like, "The terminator is ., but only if immediately preceded > by or as the first three bytes of the stream." I think they did. Note that they said that the terminator is a line containing only one character, a period. Only as an example did they provide the "." character sequence. kai -- Be indiscrete. Do it continuously.