From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/32654 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Oort Gnus branch Date: 01 Oct 2000 14:11:15 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <200009302341.e8UNfOb19577@zsh.2y.net> <200010011145.e91BjDK22933@zsh.2y.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035168903 21030 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:55:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:55:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Original-Received: from fisher.math.uh.edu (fisher.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.35]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00FE5D051E for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 08:15:15 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by fisher.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAC05074; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 07:11:44 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sun, 01 Oct 2000 07:11:07 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged)) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA25097 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 07:10:56 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.4.42]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C20D7D051E for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 08:11:19 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.159]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de with ESMTP id OAA21200; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 14:11:16 +0200 (MES) Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.20.160]) by marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de id OAA29474; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 14:11:16 +0200 (MET DST) Original-Received: (from grossjoh@localhost) by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id OAA20381; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 14:11:16 +0200 Original-To: ShengHuo ZHU X-Face: /B3twq_DELA4]7alR?%xv(/f1N;bi:NN=UlA=(1a"pKte&5/Y/9*z&8q[P}+}YgJX_9*}k_ 0E|EJBC~yEok<#VOw:9GQWq1-;PCR-hd;3|Vk]~"|EM{Q5ir5nr!HzZ,W4\k5G|QWHw45gQ*tWydTR , User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.0.90 Original-Lines: 20 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:32654 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:32654 On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, ShengHuo ZHU wrote: > I think it will be a new branch. IMHO, it would be better if the main trunk was always the most current development version. This way, people who use CVS get to test the most current version -- that's what CVS is here for, right? Also, I think we expect the 5.8/5.9 lines of development to be rather short, no? I think this is the first time that a major release is begun while using CVS, isn't it? If it wasn't the first time, we could have looked at how it was done previously. Another thought is that maybe we would like to do it like Emacs does it. So, how does Emacs handle the branches? kai -- I like BOTH kinds of music.