From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/44798
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Fallback for nnmail-split-methods
Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 23:01:00 +0200
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <vafu1pes8kz.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
References: <wklmbilobn.fsf@t-online.de>
	<vafy9eu50t7.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<m3k7qao6nz.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1021150948 27766 127.0.0.1 (11 May 2002 21:02:28 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 21:02:28 +0000 (UTC)
Return-path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 176e0Z-0007Dj-00
	for <ding-account@gmane.org>; Sat, 11 May 2002 23:02:28 +0200
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists)
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 176dzx-0005kH-00; Sat, 11 May 2002 16:01:49 -0500
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 11 May 2002 16:02:06 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA26701
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Sat, 11 May 2002 16:01:55 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: (qmail 21498 invoked by alias); 11 May 2002 21:01:33 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 21493 invoked from network); 11 May 2002 21:01:33 -0000
Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 11 May 2002 21:01:33 -0000
Original-Received: from lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lothlorien [129.217.19.67])
        by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de  with ESMTP id g4BL16b22782
        for <ding@gnus.org>; Sat, 11 May 2002 23:01:06 +0200 (MES)
Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.19.80])
	by lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de id XAA14619; Sat, 11 May 2002 23:01:00 +0200 (MET DST)
Original-Received: by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix, from userid 6104)
	id AECE93B41C; Sat, 11 May 2002 23:01:00 +0200 (CEST)
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: <m3k7qao6nz.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu> (prj@po.cwru.edu's message
 of "Sat, 11 May 2002 14:55:38 -0400")
Original-Lines: 11
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090007 (Oort Gnus v0.07) Emacs/21.2.50
 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:44798
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:44798

prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) writes:

> Wouldn't it be less surprising and more reliable to use a constant
> fallback "bogus", just like nnmail-split-fancy?

Good idea, actually.  Especially since it seems that the fallback
only works when (= (length nnmail-split-methods) 1).

kai
-- 
Silence is foo!