From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/43387
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Does Mail-Followup-To generation work?
Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2002 22:22:19 +0100
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <vafu1ryoeb8.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
References: <m3bse8s40l.fsf@fermat.mts.jhu.edu>
	<m33czkz2cm.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu>
	<m3vgcg5iw6.fsf_-_@fermat.mts.jhu.edu>
	<87664gp6c8.fsf@paradoxical.net> <m3pu2o5h0h.fsf@fermat.mts.jhu.edu>
	<vaf3czkt3xh.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<m33czkt3ec.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu>
	<vaf4rk0rniv.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<m3lmdcrn6m.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035178488 17317 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 05:34:48 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 05:34:48 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: (qmail 17376 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2002 21:23:30 -0000
Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu (mail@129.7.128.13)
  by mastaler.com with SMTP; 2 Mar 2002 21:23:30 -0000
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists)
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 16hGyF-0006uM-00; Sat, 02 Mar 2002 15:23:11 -0600
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 02 Mar 2002 15:23:12 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA13198
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Sat, 2 Mar 2002 15:22:59 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: (qmail 17355 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2002 21:22:53 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 17350 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2002 21:22:52 -0000
Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 2 Mar 2002 21:22:52 -0000
Original-Received: from lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lothlorien [129.217.19.67])
        by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de  with ESMTP id g22LMPb06933
        for <ding@gnus.org>; Sat, 2 Mar 2002 22:22:25 +0100 (MET)
Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.19.80])
	by lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de id WAA21963; Sat, 2 Mar 2002 22:22:20 +0100 (MET)
Original-Received: by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix, from userid 6104)
	id C59BF3B47E; Sat,  2 Mar 2002 22:22:19 +0100 (CET)
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: <m3lmdcrn6m.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu> (prj@po.cwru.edu's message
 of "Fri, 01 Mar 2002 16:29:47 -0500")
Original-Lines: 21
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.2.50
 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:43387
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:43387

prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) writes:

> Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Gro=DFjohann) wrote:
>> But on the other hand, why not change the MFT code to always look at
>> the group parameters?
>
> Because it's in message.el and thus shouldn't depend on Gnus group
> parameters, I guess.

Oh.  Hm.

> But it could look at the group parameters only if available, as well
> as the variables it uses now.  Would that violate any encapsulation
> principle here?

I hope not.  Hm.  Maybe it could call gnus-find-subscribed-addresses
if that function is bound.

kai
--=20
Silence is foo!