From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/39409
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Generating Mail-Followup-To: headers
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 20:17:39 +0200
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <vafu1wwrews.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
References: <87y9m9fs6b.fsf@squeaker.lickey.com>
	<m3wv1t8pui.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu>
	<87elo1exsd.fsf@squeaker.lickey.com>
	<vafy9m8udim.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<m3adyovr1z.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035175117 27705 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:38:37 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:38:37 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: (qmail 4040 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2001 18:19:18 -0000
Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu (mail@129.7.128.13)
  by mastaler.com with SMTP; 18 Oct 2001 18:19:18 -0000
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists)
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 15uHkS-00035R-00; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 13:18:28 -0500
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 18 Oct 2001 13:18:07 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA08343
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 13:17:56 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: (qmail 4011 invoked by alias); 18 Oct 2001 18:18:12 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 4006 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2001 18:18:12 -0000
Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 18 Oct 2001 18:18:12 -0000
Original-Received: from lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lothlorien [129.217.19.67])
        by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de  with ESMTP id f9IIHiX25703
        for <ding@gnus.org>; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 20:17:45 +0200 (MES)
Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.19.80])
	by lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de id UAA29209; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 20:17:39 +0200 (MET DST)
Original-Received: by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix, from userid 6104)
	id 6F7B02019; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 20:17:39 +0200 (CEST)
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: <m3adyovr1z.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu> (prj@po.cwru.edu's message
 of "Thu, 18 Oct 2001 12:41:22 -0400")
Original-Lines: 17
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.1.50
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:39409
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:39409

prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) writes:

> If MFT is present in the previous message, then yes, we use that to
> construct To+Cc in our response.  But the question here is how to
> determine whether to add MFT to our message as well.  It seems the
> best way to determine that is to check whether any of the addressees
> is a mailing list.

Ah, I see.  And we can assume that a to-list or to-address group
parameter means it's a mailing list.  Right.  But what to do in the
other cases?

Of course, the easy way out is an mft group parameter :-)

kai
-- 
GNU/Linux provides a nice `poweroff' command, but where is `poweron'?