From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/38832
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: I hate the new indentation in message-mode
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 14:04:57 +0200
Message-ID: <vafu1xzwfme.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
References: <muxitehykyq.fsf@uzeb.lrde.epita.fr>
	<vafd74o2xtr.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<microsoft-free.x4vgig42b0.fsf@slackware.mynet.pc>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035174635 24637 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:30:35 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:30:35 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <grossjoh@lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
Return-Path: <grossjoh@lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
Original-Received: (qmail 10400 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2001 12:05:29 -0000
Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 19 Sep 2001 12:05:29 -0000
Original-Received: from lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lothlorien [129.217.19.67])
	by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f8JC52U09620
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 14:05:02 +0200 (MES)
Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.19.80])
	by lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de id OAA14542; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 14:04:57 +0200 (MET DST)
Original-Received: by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix, from userid 6104)
	id 4CFE520B0; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 14:04:57 +0200 (CEST)
Original-To: Gnus List <ding@gnus.org>
In-Reply-To: <microsoft-free.x4vgig42b0.fsf@slackware.mynet.pc> (Steve
 Youngs's message of "Wed, 19 Sep 2001 07:27:47 +1000")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.106
Original-Lines: 18
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38832
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38832

Steve Youngs <youngs@xemacs.org> writes:

> Personally, I use M-TAB completion in the To|Cc etc headers (from
> BBDB).  So, for me at least, rebinding TAB wouldn't cause me any
> suffering. 

But TAB can do completion in Newsgroups headers, too.  And more
headers if you add the entry in message-completion-alist.

> But really, when you are in the middle of editing some text, a TAB
> should be a TAB.  Not some other fancy thing.  And most people expect
> their TABs to be consistent.

A matter of taste, I guess.

kai
-- 
Symbol's function definition is void: signature