From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36699 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Score on thread? Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 22:22:17 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035172244 10019 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:50:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:50:44 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 548 invoked from network); 26 Jun 2001 08:45:57 -0000 Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42) by gnus.org with SMTP; 26 Jun 2001 08:45:57 -0000 Original-Received: from marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.159]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de with ESMTP id WAA07989 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 22:22:18 +0200 (MES) Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.20.160]) by marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de id WAA08426; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 22:22:17 +0200 (MET DST) Original-Received: (from grossjoh@localhost) by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id WAA08106; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 22:22:17 +0200 X-Face: 6=pZ4hVbjN:C?j1$h/-bi4:F%*~B#Rxb$[0%!{5NK"dE:_QRAM]Dzl=$yMu%Rh4xCSm/#>! $n%@SHJ](KFJKL,uF\=G=bRJQC$ ?+Dlxu*pj.Z,-GK<~y7sd/l*PN\]>} (Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE's message of "Sun, 24 Jun 2001 14:13:46 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.104 Original-Lines: 33 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36699 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36699 On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Kai Gro=DFjohann wrote: > I'm no scoring expert. In a German newsgroup about news readers, > people said that Fort=E9 Agent can do better scoring on threads than > Gnus, because Gnus only looks at the References headers of the > articles, whereas Agent builds the thread tree first, then scores in > that tree. It turns out that there is the following in the Gnus info file: /----[ Score File Format ] | "Thread" | This match key works along the same lines as the | `Followup' match key. If you say that you want to score | on a (sub-)thread started by an article with a | `Message-ID' X, then you add a `thread' match. This | will add a new `thread' match for each article that has | X in its `References' header. (These new `thread' | matches will use the `Message-ID's of these matching | articles.) This will ensure that you can raise/lower | the score of an entire thread, even though some articles | in the thread may not have complete `References' | headers. Note that using this may lead to | undeterministic scores of the articles in the thread. | (Using this match key will lead to creation of `ADAPT' | files.) \---- I think this means that Gnus is as smart as Agent. Right? kai --=20 ~/.signature: No such file or directory