From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/7221 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai Grossjohann Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Li'l Feature Wish Date: 17 Jul 1996 08:30:27 +0200 Sender: grossjoh@charly.informatik.uni-dortmund.de Message-ID: References: <199607151655.SAA00699@bombur2.uio.no> Reply-To: Kai Grossjohann NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.52) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035147560 6309 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:59:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:59:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@ifi.uio.no Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id AAA07668 for ; Wed, 17 Jul 1996 00:08:29 -0700 Original-Received: from floyd.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (floyd.informatik.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.4.40]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Wed, 17 Jul 1996 08:30:32 +0200 Original-Received: from dusty.informatik.uni-dortmund.de by floyd.informatik.uni-dortmund.de with SMTP (Sendmail 8.7.5/UniDo 3.11) id IAA09912; Wed, 17 Jul 1996 08:30:30 +0200 (MES) Original-Received: by dusty.informatik.uni-dortmund.de id AA22175; Wed, 17 Jul 96 08:30:29 +0200 Original-To: Hallvard B Furuseth In-Reply-To: Hallvard B Furuseth's message of Mon, 15 Jul 1996 18:55:44 +0200 (MET DST) Original-Lines: 25 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.2.35/Emacs 19.30 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:7221 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:7221 >>>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 1996 18:55:44 +0200 (MET DST), Hallvard B >>>>> Furuseth said: Hallvard> Suggestion: If `gnus-show-treads' is an integer, only Hallvard> thread if there are at most gnus-show-treads articles in Hallvard> the summary buffer. What I wanted was to be able to decide whether I wanted to enter a threaded or an unthreaded summary buffer. As Lars explained, the speed difference isn't all that great. The problem is with having to generate the summary twice in the `enter the group, then toggle threading' scheme. I still wish there were one of the following: - an extra key to toggle the threading in the *Group* buffer - a way to decide, when entering the group, whether it should be threaded or not. Btw, RET vs M-RET comes close to the second goal, but after limiting, threading is turned on again (after M-RET). kai -- Life is hard and then you die.