Re: Override MFT?

[Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann)]

prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) writes:

> Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann) wrote:
>> Well, err.  I tried all them keys, and I got messages to the
>> addresses in Reply-to (which were two addresses of A), but B was not
>> included.  I had expected at least `S V' to include B...
>
> Oh, so MFT included *only* you?

Yep.

> Hm.  Frobbing message-use-mail-followup-to seems like the thing to
> do in that case.  I guess it would be nice to have a key that would
> set m-u-m-f-t to nil or 'ask for just the next followup, and set it
> back to its original value afterwards.  Or something.  I'm not sure
> how to do that, though.  Maybe gnus-summary-very-wide-reply* should
> always bind m-u-m-f-t, but that seems intrusive.

I don't feel it's intrusive.  But maybe that's because I don't know
what is the difference between wide reply and very wide reply.

> Was this MFT automatically generated?  If so, the software that did
> that should be fixed.

A, B and me are all using Gnus.  But how that MFT came about, I don't
know.  Hm.

kai
-- 
Silence is foo!