From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/44179 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Override MFT? Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2002 23:39:27 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1018042891 26207 127.0.0.1 (5 Apr 2002 21:41:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 21:41:31 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16tbSc-0006oa-00 for ; Fri, 05 Apr 2002 23:41:31 +0200 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 16tbRR-0001Wf-00; Fri, 05 Apr 2002 15:40:17 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 05 Apr 2002 15:40:25 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA21983 for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2002 15:40:13 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 15274 invoked by alias); 5 Apr 2002 21:40:00 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 15266 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2002 21:40:00 -0000 Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42) by gnus.org with SMTP; 5 Apr 2002 21:40:00 -0000 Original-Received: from lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lothlorien [129.217.19.67]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de with ESMTP id g35LdWb20111 for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2002 22:39:33 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.19.80]) by lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de id XAA08823; Fri, 5 Apr 2002 23:39:27 +0200 (MET DST) Original-Received: by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix, from userid 6104) id 8BB343AEE2; Fri, 5 Apr 2002 23:39:27 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (prj@po.cwru.edu's message of "Fri, 05 Apr 2002 14:57:32 -0500") Original-Lines: 30 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.2.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:44179 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:44179 prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) writes: > Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Gro=DFjohann) wrote: >> Well, err. I tried all them keys, and I got messages to the >> addresses in Reply-to (which were two addresses of A), but B was not >> included. I had expected at least `S V' to include B... > > Oh, so MFT included *only* you? Yep. > Hm. Frobbing message-use-mail-followup-to seems like the thing to > do in that case. I guess it would be nice to have a key that would > set m-u-m-f-t to nil or 'ask for just the next followup, and set it > back to its original value afterwards. Or something. I'm not sure > how to do that, though. Maybe gnus-summary-very-wide-reply* should > always bind m-u-m-f-t, but that seems intrusive. I don't feel it's intrusive. But maybe that's because I don't know what is the difference between wide reply and very wide reply. > Was this MFT automatically generated? If so, the software that did > that should be fixed. A, B and me are all using Gnus. But how that MFT came about, I don't know. Hm. kai --=20 Silence is foo!