From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36276
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: more on accessing the body via split rules...
Date: 18 May 2001 18:56:59 +0200
Message-ID: <vafvgmyh9yc.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
References: <87r8xmg02v.fsf@mclinux.com> <87d796d5xw.fsf@mclinux.com>
	<vafg0e2iql6.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> <878zjud3cs.fsf@mclinux.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171889 7714 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:44:49 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:44:49 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@gnus.org>
Original-Received: (qmail 23504 invoked by alias); 18 May 2001 16:57:27 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 23499 invoked from network); 18 May 2001 16:57:27 -0000
Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 18 May 2001 16:57:26 -0000
Original-Received: from marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.159]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de  with ESMTP id SAA14881 for <ding@gnus.org>; Fri, 18 May 2001 18:56:59 +0200 (MES)
Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.20.160])
	by marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de id SAA06642; Fri, 18 May 2001 18:56:59 +0200 (MET DST)
Original-Received: (from grossjoh@localhost)
	by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id SAA31723;
	Fri, 18 May 2001 18:56:59 +0200
X-Face: 6=pZ4hVbjN:C?j1$h/-bi4:F%*~B#Rxb$[0%!{5NK"dE:_QRAM]Dzl=$yMu%Rh4xCSm/#>!
 $n%@SHJ](K<taDos\M;zw#b7gIc01F@'f{.guD~];wV{#\SX0YlGR6fREpYY>FJKL,uF\=G=bRJQC$
 ?+Dlxu*pj.Z,-GK<~y7sd/l*PN\]>}<oCe5vw:p#\Gsv#E(:`3Jl2*()0,/H
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: <878zjud3cs.fsf@mclinux.com> (Josh Huber's message of "18 May 2001 12:33:07 -0400")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.104
Original-Lines: 14
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36276
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36276

On 18 May 2001, Josh Huber wrote:

> That's the first thing I thought of, except that the original
> article buffer is still around for when I hit 'g' to re-read my
> spool files again, so the variable is set *and* the buffer exists,
> but it has the contents of some other message in it.

Gack.  That's bad.  Why don't you make a bug report that says that
there should be a variable pointing to the right buffer during
splitting.  Or that respooling should also use " *nnmail incoming*".

kai
-- 
The passive voice should never be used.