From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/35938 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Gnus and nil secondary select methods? Date: 19 Apr 2001 15:30:05 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87pue97i13.fsf@harpo.homeip.net> <87lmox6n5y.fsf@harpo.homeip.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171608 5843 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:40:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:40:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 23079 invoked by alias); 19 Apr 2001 13:30:31 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 23074 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2001 13:30:30 -0000 Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42) by gnus.org with SMTP; 19 Apr 2001 13:30:30 -0000 Original-Received: from marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.159]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de with ESMTP id PAA23428; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 15:30:07 +0200 (MES) Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.20.160]) by marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de id PAA27739; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 15:30:06 +0200 (MET DST) Original-Received: (from grossjoh@localhost) by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id PAA13214; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 15:30:06 +0200 X-Face: 6=pZ4hVbjN:C?j1$h/-bi4:F%*~B#Rxb$[0%!{5NK"dE:_QRAM]Dzl=$yMu%Rh4xCSm/#>! $n%@SHJ](KFJKL,uF\=G=bRJQC$ ?+Dlxu*pj.Z,-GK<~y7sd/l*PN\]>} In-Reply-To: <87lmox6n5y.fsf@harpo.homeip.net> (Samuel Padgett's message of "19 Apr 2001 09:20:57 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090003 (Oort Gnus v0.03) Emacs/21.0.103 Original-Lines: 20 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:35938 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:35938 On 19 Apr 2001, Samuel Padgett wrote: > Hm. Wonder why nnml is in there? Could this be causing the > problem? > > (setq gnus-message-archive-method '(nnml "")) Yes. > If so, how can I archive messages using the nnml, but persuade Gnus > not to read from my mail spool? (setq mail-sources nil) Or maybe (setq gnus-message-archive-method '(nnml "" (nnml-get-new-mail nil))). kai -- The passive voice should never be used.