* Override MFT?
@ 2002-04-05 16:23 Kai Großjohann
2002-04-05 16:29 ` Paul Jarc
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kai Großjohann @ 2002-04-05 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
I get a message where MFT appears to be wrong. (A sent the message
to me, Cc'ing B, but MFT gives me! I think I don't need to send a
followup to myself.)
I tried F, S W, S V.
kai
--
Silence is foo!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Override MFT?
2002-04-05 16:23 Override MFT? Kai Großjohann
@ 2002-04-05 16:29 ` Paul Jarc
2002-04-05 17:20 ` Kai Großjohann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paul Jarc @ 2002-04-05 16:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann) wrote:
> I get a message where MFT appears to be wrong. (A sent the message
> to me, Cc'ing B, but MFT gives me! I think I don't need to send a
> followup to myself.)
>
> I tried F, S W, S V.
message-dont-reply-to-name ought to override that part of MFT. If it
doesn't: (setq message-use-mail-followup-to 'ask)
paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Override MFT?
2002-04-05 16:29 ` Paul Jarc
@ 2002-04-05 17:20 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-04-05 19:57 ` Paul Jarc
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kai Großjohann @ 2002-04-05 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) writes:
> Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann) wrote:
>> I get a message where MFT appears to be wrong. (A sent the message
>> to me, Cc'ing B, but MFT gives me! I think I don't need to send a
>> followup to myself.)
>>
>> I tried F, S W, S V.
>
> message-dont-reply-to-name ought to override that part of MFT. If it
> doesn't: (setq message-use-mail-followup-to 'ask)
Well, err. I tried all them keys, and I got messages to the
addresses in Reply-to (which were two addresses of A), but B was not
included. I had expected at least `S V' to include B...
kai
--
Silence is foo!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Override MFT?
2002-04-05 17:20 ` Kai Großjohann
@ 2002-04-05 19:57 ` Paul Jarc
2002-04-05 21:39 ` Kai Großjohann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paul Jarc @ 2002-04-05 19:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann) wrote:
> Well, err. I tried all them keys, and I got messages to the
> addresses in Reply-to (which were two addresses of A), but B was not
> included. I had expected at least `S V' to include B...
Oh, so MFT included *only* you? Hm. Frobbing
message-use-mail-followup-to seems like the thing to do in that case.
I guess it would be nice to have a key that would set m-u-m-f-t to nil
or 'ask for just the next followup, and set it back to its original
value afterwards. Or something. I'm not sure how to do that, though.
Maybe gnus-summary-very-wide-reply* should always bind m-u-m-f-t, but
that seems intrusive.
Was this MFT automatically generated? If so, the software that did
that should be fixed.
paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Override MFT?
2002-04-05 19:57 ` Paul Jarc
@ 2002-04-05 21:39 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-04-05 21:43 ` Paul Jarc
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kai Großjohann @ 2002-04-05 21:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) writes:
> Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann) wrote:
>> Well, err. I tried all them keys, and I got messages to the
>> addresses in Reply-to (which were two addresses of A), but B was not
>> included. I had expected at least `S V' to include B...
>
> Oh, so MFT included *only* you?
Yep.
> Hm. Frobbing message-use-mail-followup-to seems like the thing to
> do in that case. I guess it would be nice to have a key that would
> set m-u-m-f-t to nil or 'ask for just the next followup, and set it
> back to its original value afterwards. Or something. I'm not sure
> how to do that, though. Maybe gnus-summary-very-wide-reply* should
> always bind m-u-m-f-t, but that seems intrusive.
I don't feel it's intrusive. But maybe that's because I don't know
what is the difference between wide reply and very wide reply.
> Was this MFT automatically generated? If so, the software that did
> that should be fixed.
A, B and me are all using Gnus. But how that MFT came about, I don't
know. Hm.
kai
--
Silence is foo!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Override MFT?
2002-04-05 21:39 ` Kai Großjohann
@ 2002-04-05 21:43 ` Paul Jarc
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paul Jarc @ 2002-04-05 21:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann) wrote:
> A, B and me are all using Gnus. But how that MFT came about, I don't
> know. Hm.
A guess: A has your address as to-list or to-address for some group, and
also has (t (subscribed . t)) in gnus-parameters, or equivalent. If
this is the case, A should add a more specific entry to set subscribed
to nil for the group in question.
paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-04-05 21:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-04-05 16:23 Override MFT? Kai Großjohann
2002-04-05 16:29 ` Paul Jarc
2002-04-05 17:20 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-04-05 19:57 ` Paul Jarc
2002-04-05 21:39 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-04-05 21:43 ` Paul Jarc
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).