From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/37008 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Please test tentative change: annotations in nnml groups Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 01:29:23 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035172499 11597 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:54:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:54:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 22110 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2001 23:29:53 -0000 Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42) by gnus.org with SMTP; 21 Jul 2001 23:29:53 -0000 Original-Received: from lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.19.67]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de with ESMTP id BAA11355; Sun, 22 Jul 2001 01:29:24 +0200 (MES) Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.19.80]) by lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de id BAA27008; Sun, 22 Jul 2001 01:29:24 +0200 (MET DST) Original-Received: (from grossjoh@localhost) by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id BAA29395; Sun, 22 Jul 2001 01:29:23 +0200 Original-To: Harry Putnam In-Reply-To: (Harry Putnam's message of "21 Jul 2001 16:10:13 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.105 Original-Lines: 24 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37008 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37008 On 21 Jul 2001, Harry Putnam wrote: > You mentioned it. I probably phrased that poorly. What I ment was > even with gnus-post-method = current, if you actually send the > message it gets queued of you are in unplugged mode.. Not a bad > thing necessarily, I only mention it in counterposition to the > `insert-into-group' method which doesn't involve actual sending. Ah, now I understand. > Are there benefits derived from sending these annotations? Seems > cleaner to just insert them. I mean the idea is to just use this on > disk right? Well, err. One advantage is that you can use it together with gnus-delay.el. Another advantage is that Gnus does some magic when sending messages, and by using the normal sending mechanism I can profit from that magic, without really understanding it. (One example of the magic is the header frobbing. Another example is dealing with the MML tags.) kai -- ~/.signature: No such file or directory