From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/35014 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: `user-mail-address' for message-ids Date: 27 Feb 2001 18:49:49 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <20010223133030.B14991@mastaler.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035170828 770 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:27:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:27:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Original-Received: from lisa.math.uh.edu (lisa.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.49]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 690D8D049D for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 12:50:23 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by lisa.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAB22140; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:50:14 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:49:33 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged)) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA12573 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:49:22 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.4.42]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35301D049D for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 12:49:52 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.159]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de with ESMTP id SAA05007; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 18:49:50 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.20.160]) by marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de id SAA28937; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 18:49:50 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: (from grossjoh@localhost) by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id SAA27781; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 18:49:49 +0100 X-Face: 6=pZ4hVbjN:C?j1$h/-bi4:F%*~B#Rxb$[0%!{5NK"dE:_QRAM]Dzl=$yMu%Rh4xCSm/#>! $n%@SHJ](KFJKL,uF\=G=bRJQC$ ?+Dlxu*pj.Z,-GK<~y7sd/l*PN\]>} In-Reply-To: ("Jason R. Mastaler"'s message of "27 Feb 2001 10:19:41 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0.01) Emacs/21.0.99 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Original-Lines: 19 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:35014 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:35014 On 27 Feb 2001, Jason R. Mastaler wrote: > Per Abrahamsen writes: > >> Yes. It would increase the risk of duplicate message ids, i.e. all >> the users of all the machines in our department share the >> 'dina.kvl.dk' mail host name, but I'm the only one using ssv2. > > By this argument, using (system-name) for the message-id doesn't > insure uniqueness. In your case you are the only one using ssv2, > but consider large multiuser servers where hundreds of gnus users > may be using the same machine. The lhs should be unique on that host, and the rhs should uniquely identify the host. Gnus should make sure that the lhs is unique even if several people use the same machine. kai -- Be indiscrete. Do it continuously.