Re: Fallback for nnmail-split-methods

[Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann)]

Thomas.Gehrlein@t-online.de (Thomas Gehrlein) writes:

> nnmail-split-fancy has a fallback option for mails that don't match any of the
> splitting rules.  nnmail-split-methods doesnt't provide a fallback.  I
> discovered this after some of my mails had disappeared.

It appears that there is now some code which is supposed to do this:
the last group mentioned in nnmail-split-methods is used as the
fallback.

Can someone confirm this?

There is the following comment in the code:

	  ;; Go through the split methods to find a match.

Some lines down, there is this snippet:

	      ;; This is the final group, which is used as a
	      ;; catch-all.
	      (unless group-art
		(setq group-art
		      (list (cons (car method)
				  (funcall func (car method)))))))))

I think this does the trick, but I haven't tested it.  Could you test
it?

kai
-- 
Silence is foo!