From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8594
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Kai Grossjohann <grossjohann@charly.informatik.uni-dortmund.de>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: writable NNTP server -- the saga continues
Date: 05 Nov 1996 13:26:37 +0100
Sender: grossjoh@charly.informatik.uni-dortmund.de
Message-ID: <vafybggloci.fsf@ls6.informatik.uni-dortmund.de>
References: <vafybgh7vgi.fsf@ls6.informatik.uni-dortmund.de> <m2918h46hy.fsf@proletcult.eyesore.no>
Reply-To: Kai Grossjohann <grossjohann@charly.informatik.uni-dortmund.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148738 13077 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:18:58 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:18:58 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ding@ifi.uio.no
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: (qmail 4541 invoked from smtpd); 5 Nov 1996 13:42:54 -0000
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2)
  by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 5 Nov 1996 13:42:50 -0000
Original-Received: from fbi-mail.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (fbi-mail.informatik.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.4.42]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <NAA05512@ifi.uio.no> ; Tue, 5 Nov 1996 13:27:38 +0100
Original-Received: from lucy.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (lucy.informatik.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.160]) by fbi-mail.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (8.8.2/) with SMTP id NAA17080; Tue, 5 Nov 1996 13:26:40 +0100 (MET)
Original-Received: by lucy.informatik.uni-dortmund.de id NAA04290; Tue, 5 Nov 1996 13:26:40 +0100
Original-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 05 Nov 1996 03:31:53 +0100
Original-Lines: 25
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.52/Emacs 19.31
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8594
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8594

>>>>> Kai Grossjohann <grossjohann@ls6.informatik.uni-dortmund.de>
>>>>> writes:

  Kai> [...] Also, the nnmk-request-expire-articles function returns
  Kai> nil (no articles were not deleted -- this _is_ the meaning of
  Kai> the return value of *-request-expire-articles, isn't it?).

>>>>> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes:

  Lars> Yes, but that's not the function that's called when moving
  Lars> articles.  `nnmk-request-move-article' is the one that's
  Lars> called, and it should return a `(group . article)' cons cell
  Lars> that says what the group name and article number the article
  Lars> was moved to.

Oops, my nnmk-request-move-article evals accept-form and deletes the
article if non-nil (using nnmk-request-expire-articles).  The return
value of nnmk-request-move-article is the result of evaling
accept-form.

I see now that this is all wrong.  Sorry.  Going back to hacking...

kai
-- 
Life is hard and then you die.