From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8585 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai Grossjohann Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: writable NNTP server -- the saga continues Date: 04 Nov 1996 16:04:29 +0100 Sender: grossjoh@charly.informatik.uni-dortmund.de Message-ID: Reply-To: Kai Grossjohann NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148731 13031 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:18:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:18:51 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 27653 invoked from smtpd); 4 Nov 1996 15:50:18 -0000 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2) by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 4 Nov 1996 15:50:17 -0000 Original-Received: from fbi-mail.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (fbi-mail.informatik.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.4.42]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Mon, 4 Nov 1996 16:04:44 +0100 Original-Received: from lucy.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (lucy.informatik.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.160]) by fbi-mail.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (8.8.2/) with SMTP id QAA02819 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 1996 16:04:32 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: by lucy.informatik.uni-dortmund.de id QAA11120; Mon, 4 Nov 1996 16:04:31 +0100 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no Original-Lines: 24 X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.52/Emacs 19.31 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8585 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8585 Hi there, I've been hacking the expiring articles stuff. This seems to work OK, but Gnus doesn't think an article has been deleted. To clarify: let's say I move 5 articles from group A to group B. Then Gnus will tell me that it's moving all these articles, and it will also tell me for each article that it's deleting them (as it should). The NNTP server log tells me that there has been an XDELETE command for each article, all of which were completed successfully. Also, the nnmk-request-expire-articles function returns nil (no articles were not deleted -- this _is_ the meaning of the return value of *-request-expire-articles, isn't it?). Usually, after moving articles from a group, the mark changes to "G", but with my implementation the mark doesn't change (it remains "!" or "r" or "R" or whatever it was before). What did I do wrong? tia, kai -- Life is hard and then you die.