From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36219 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: letting split rules have access to the message body... Date: 15 May 2001 11:24:20 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87pudg99j9.fsf@mclinux.com> <87bsovlp5m.fsf@mclinux.com> <87k83jk4sx.fsf@mclinux.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171842 7391 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:44:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:44:02 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 11348 invoked by alias); 15 May 2001 09:24:48 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 11343 invoked from network); 15 May 2001 09:24:48 -0000 Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42) by gnus.org with SMTP; 15 May 2001 09:24:48 -0000 Original-Received: from marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.159]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de with ESMTP id LAA03595 for ; Tue, 15 May 2001 11:24:20 +0200 (MES) Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.20.160]) by marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de id LAA22713; Tue, 15 May 2001 11:24:20 +0200 (MET DST) Original-Received: (from grossjoh@localhost) by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id LAA05142; Tue, 15 May 2001 11:24:20 +0200 X-Face: 6=pZ4hVbjN:C?j1$h/-bi4:F%*~B#Rxb$[0%!{5NK"dE:_QRAM]Dzl=$yMu%Rh4xCSm/#>! $n%@SHJ](KFJKL,uF\=G=bRJQC$ ?+Dlxu*pj.Z,-GK<~y7sd/l*PN\]>} (Josh Huber's message of "14 May 2001 17:18:38 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.104 Original-Lines: 20 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36219 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36219 On 14 May 2001, Josh Huber wrote: > Is it possible (for example) to narrow to the body of the already > narrowed region, and somehow widen to the previously narrowed > region? something like pop-narrow? :) I'm sure that (save-restriction ...narrow to headers...) (save-restriction ...narrow to body...) does the right thing: after the first save-restriction returns, the previous narrowing is in effect. save-restriction is like let for narrowing boundaries. kai -- The passive voice should never be used.