From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/33385 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: archiving sent messages Date: 16 Nov 2000 23:03:09 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035169503 24855 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:05:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:05:03 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from spinoza.math.uh.edu (spinoza.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.18]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F12D049A for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 02:17:05 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by spinoza.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAB08674; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 01:16:47 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 17 Nov 2000 01:15:57 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@[209.196.61.66]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA20369 for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 01:15:43 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.4.42]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8FECD049A for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 02:15:39 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.159]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de with ESMTP id XAA12615 for ; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 23:03:15 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.20.160]) by marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de id XAA17098; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 23:03:14 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: (from grossjoh@localhost) by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id XAA25442; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 23:03:14 +0100 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: /B3twq_DELA4]7alR?%xv(/f1N;bi:NN=UlA=(1a"pKte&5/Y/9*z&8q[P}+}YgJX_9*}k_ 0E|EJBC~yEok<#VOw:9GQWq1-;PCR-hd;3|Vk]~"|EM{Q5ir5nr!HzZ,W4\k5G|QWHw45gQ*tWydTR , User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.0.90 Original-Lines: 36 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:33385 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:33385 On 16 Nov 2000, Paul Jarc wrote: > Should I be using gnus-outgoing-message-group instead? This is a matter of taste, I guess. I think you can put a Lisp form in gnus-message-archive-group but only a function name in gnus-outgoing-message-group. But don't take my word for it. > Or gcc-self group parameters? I don't really like these. They are very simple to use, but not very flexible. You can inherit the gcc-self group parameter via topics, but you can't easily suppress them for news groups, say. (Except via topics.) > Can I avoid Gcc fields by using gnus-outgoing-message-group and > setting it to a function that returns nil or ("nnmaildir:mail.sent") > depending on whether the message should be archived? No. gnus-outgoing-message-group is all about Gcc headers. But why do you think Gcc headers are bad? You could use Bcc instead. Or Fcc. > Is Gcc normally included in the sent copy, No. Never, in fact. I don't think it is possible to write a message such that the recipient sees a Gcc header; Gnus removes it before sending. > and can it be easily removed? Well. Can something be removed that isn't there? ;-) kai -- The arms should be held in a natural and unaffected way and never be conspicuous. -- Revised Technique of Latin American Dancing