Undigestifying incoming mail?

Undigestifying incoming mail?

[Kees de Bruin]

I'm subscribed to a number of mailing lists that come in a digested form
and are now processed using C-d in the summary buffer. However, what I
would like is that the undigestifying is done while distributing the
incoming mail over my nnml groups.

Kind regards,

-- 
Kees de Bruin                                           Tasking Software BV
Software Engineer
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
telephone:  +31 33 455 85 84                            Tasking Software BV
fax:        +31 33 455 10 05                            Plotterweg 31
email:      kees_de_bruin@tasking.com                   3821 BB  Amersfoort
WWW:        http://www.tasking.com                      The Netherlands
CompuServe: GO TASKING
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
	     -----  Quality Development Tools Worldwide  -----
		    -----------------------------------

Re: Undigestifying incoming mail?

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

kees_de_bruin@tasking.nl (Kees de Bruin) writes:

> I'm subscribed to a number of mailing lists that come in a digested form
> and are now processed using C-d in the summary buffer. However, what I
> would like is that the undigestifying is done while distributing the
> incoming mail over my nnml groups.

This isn't currently possible.  I've now added it to the todo list.

-- 
  "Yes.  The journey through the human heart 
     would have to wait until some other time."

Re: Undigestifying incoming mail?

[Steinar Bang]

>>>>> kees_de_bruin@tasking.nl (Kees de Bruin):

> I'm subscribed to a number of mailing lists that come in a digested form
> and are now processed using C-d in the summary buffer. However, what I
> would like is that the undigestifying is done while distributing the
> incoming mail over my nnml groups.

This should be possible to do with procmail delivery to a spool mbox
file (NB! I haven't actually tried it).


- Steinar

Re: Undigestifying incoming mail?

[Holger Franz]

>>>>> "Steinar" == Steinar Bang <sb@metis.no> writes:

>>>>> kees_de_bruin@tasking.nl (Kees de Bruin):
 >> I'm subscribed to a number of mailing lists that come in a
 >> digested form and are now processed using C-d in the summary
 >> buffer. However, what I would like is that the undigestifying is
 >> done while distributing the incoming mail over my nnml groups.

 Steinar> This should be possible to do with procmail delivery to a
 Steinar> spool mbox file (NB! I haven't actually tried it).

I have tried it on the ding-rn-digest list an it worked just fine. A
cookbook recipe:
 * Get procmail: ftp://ftp.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/pub/packages/procmail/
 * Follow the installation procedure and note the subtleties involved
   with older versions of sendmail.
 * use a '.procmailrc' with something like:

---8<---
PATH=$HOME/bin:$HOME/Abin:/usr/bin:/usr/ucb:/bin:/usr/local/bin:.
MAILDIR=$HOME/spool	# You'd better make sure it exists
DEFAULT=$MAILDIR/mbox.spool
LOGFILE=$MAILDIR/from
LOCKFILE=$HOME/.lockmail

# An alternative and probably more efficient solution to splitting up a digest
# would be (only works for standard format mailbox files though):
:0:
* ^Subject:.*Digest
|formail +1 -ds cat >>mbox.spool

# Anything that has not been delivered by now will go to $DEFAULT
# using LOCKFILE=$DEFAULT$LOCKEXT
---8<---

The procmail package contains some more elaborate rules examples.

Of course you will have to add 
(setq nnmail-use-procmail t              
      nnmail-procmail-directory (expand-file-name "~/spool/")
      nnmail-resplit-incoming t)
to your '.gnus'.

Holger

-- 
Holger Franz <hfranz@physik.rwth-aachen.de>                             

Caution: feeding Gnus to your XEmacs will make it fat.