From: Reid Rivenburgh <reid@lanl.gov>
Subject: Better handling of reply configuration
Date: 15 Mar 2000 15:05:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <vetwvn3nb3a.fsf@toespaz.c3.lanl.gov> (raw)
One of the few areas where gnus is awkward is the handling of
frames/windows when replying to mail. I've looked over the gnus
configuration capabilities, but either it doesn't offer quite enough
or I'm too ignorant to use it correctly (yes, probably the latter). I
also searched in various places and came up basically empty.
The problem is that when replying, the reply buffer takes over the
frame. If I want to refer back to the original message (if I haven't
yanked it into the reply) or look at a different message, I have to go
through some buffer switching and resizing contortions.
This can be solved by either:
1. Giving the reply its own frame. This would work fine, but I've had
a heck of a time getting the frame to go away (delete or iconify)
when done and having the original frame be unaffected by the reply
creation. It would also be nice for general mail composition, not
just replying.
2. Set up a configuration in a single frame such that the reply takes
up only a portion of the frame, leaving the summary and article
buffers visible (but probably reduced in size). This ought to
work, too, but there's a question of what happens to the reply
buffer if I quit the summary to look in another group. I tried the
following, but I didn't know how the buffer-live-p split form
syntax should look (the example in the manual only uses a single
form after the if). I think I'm on the right track....
(gnus-add-configuration
'(reply
(horizontal 1.0
(vertical 20
(if (buffer-live-p gnus-message-buffer)
'(list (summary .2)
(message 1.0 point))
'((summary .8 point)
(tree 1.0))))
(vertical 1.0
(article 1.0)))))
I thought I'd throw this out to the list in case anyone has solved the
problem. Thanks in advance.
Reid
next reply other threads:[~2000-03-15 22:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-03-15 22:05 Reid Rivenburgh [this message]
2000-03-15 23:43 ` Kai Großjohann
2000-03-15 23:51 ` Reid Rivenburgh
2000-03-16 0:20 ` Kai Großjohann
2000-03-16 18:03 ` David S. Goldberg
2000-03-16 22:42 ` Reid Rivenburgh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=vetwvn3nb3a.fsf@toespaz.c3.lanl.gov \
--to=reid@lanl.gov \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).