From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/48032 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Fabrice Popineau Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Splitting again ? Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 10:24:24 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1039080194 7364 80.91.224.249 (5 Dec 2002 09:23:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 09:23:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18JsDv-0001uS-00 for ; Thu, 05 Dec 2002 10:23:12 +0100 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 18JsFc-000454-00; Thu, 05 Dec 2002 03:24:56 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 05 Dec 2002 03:25:45 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id DAA19131 for ; Thu, 5 Dec 2002 03:25:32 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 4265 invoked by alias); 5 Dec 2002 09:24:38 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 4256 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2002 09:24:38 -0000 Original-Received: from esemetz.ese-metz.fr (root@193.48.224.212) by gnus.org with SMTP; 5 Dec 2002 09:24:38 -0000 Original-Received: from ANSIBLE.ese-metz.fr ([193.48.224.245]) by esemetz.ese-metz.fr (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id gB59O6Z14432; Thu, 5 Dec 2002 10:24:06 +0100 Original-To: Marco Lonsing In-Reply-To: (Marco Lonsing's message of "Thu, 05 Dec 2002 10:21:33 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) XEmacs/21.5 (brussels sprouts, i586-pc-win32) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:48032 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:48032 * Marco Lonsing writes: > Do you mean B r (respooling) the article?. Possibly yes, I mean especially: what side effect does it have (if any) a part from sendind it again through the splitting rules? Because I envisage to apply this to a bunch of big mailboxes to get a finer grain of splitting. -- Fabrice