From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/46859
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Clemens Fischer <ino@despammed.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: spam*.el and ifile-gnus.el?
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 23:40:11 +0200
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <vg4nupfo.fsf@ID-23066.news.dfncis.de>
References: <vaf8z29eogn.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> <8765xdva0q.fsf@emacswiki.org>
 <vaf3csgyhh5.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
 <rpvadmoul74.fsf@django.timesten.com> <uadmnusoj.fsf@castify.net>
 <uv6lm66ikpa.fsf@suspiria.ai.mit.edu> <E17pk4z-0000mc-00@eris.void.at>
 <uv6admmjr3l.fsf@suspiria.ai.mit.edu> <uvg5atjjl.fsf@castify.net>
 <m3bs6fpdv9.fsf@heechee.beld.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1033428299 32372 127.0.0.1 (30 Sep 2002 23:24:59 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 23:24:59 +0000 (UTC)
Return-path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17w9uL-0008Pt-00
	for <ding-account@gmane.org>; Tue, 01 Oct 2002 01:24:57 +0200
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists)
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 17w9tN-0002Hz-00; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 18:23:57 -0500
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 30 Sep 2002 18:24:38 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA25668
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 18:24:25 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: (qmail 10209 invoked by alias); 30 Sep 2002 23:23:39 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 10204 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2002 23:23:39 -0000
Original-Received: from main.gmane.org (80.91.224.249)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 30 Sep 2002 23:23:39 -0000
Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17w9sk-0008LI-00
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Tue, 01 Oct 2002 01:23:18 +0200
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
Original-Received: from news by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17w9sk-0008L9-00
	for <gmane-emacs-ding@m.gmane.org>; Tue, 01 Oct 2002 01:23:18 +0200
Original-Path: ID-23066.news.dfncis.de!not-for-mail
Original-Lines: 16
Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: p3e9baaa0.dip.t-dialin.net
Original-X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1033428198 32061 62.155.170.160 (30 Sep 2002 23:23:18 GMT)
Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 23:23:18 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2 (i386--freebsd)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:4h3W/keplz4v8Sntfga2LecF1pc=
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:46859
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:46859

Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:

> On Fri, 13 Sep 2002, kohrs@castify.net wrote:
>> Second, would ifile make sense on headers only, for spam decisions ?
>
> I think so, I am able to visually distinguish spam messages in about
> 95% of the cases based on the subject: header alone, in the summary
> buffer.  Spam messages are generally about things you don't care about :)

letting ifile judge on the subject line alone if it usually gets
messages in toto may give wrong results.  or maybe if it is really
only the subject line, then you'll miss "only" the porn spams saying
"hello, darling" or "back from vacation".  chances rise if you feed
all of the headers, but full accuracy comes from full data, as always.

clemens