From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/46787 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Fabrice Popineau Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: coding-system conflicts ? Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 10:15:47 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1033114644 7002 127.0.0.1 (27 Sep 2002 08:17:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 08:17:24 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17uqJP-0001oo-00 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 10:17:23 +0200 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 17uqIr-000194-00; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 03:16:49 -0500 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 27 Sep 2002 03:17:28 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id DAA18864 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 03:17:18 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (qmail 28317 invoked by alias); 27 Sep 2002 08:16:34 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 28308 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2002 08:16:34 -0000 Original-Received: from esemetz.ese-metz.fr (root@193.48.224.212) by gnus.org with SMTP; 27 Sep 2002 08:16:34 -0000 Original-Received: from NEVERYON.ese-metz.fr (neveryon.ese-metz.fr [193.48.224.220]) by esemetz.ese-metz.fr (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g8R8HQ223348 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 10:17:27 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 19 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) XEmacs/21.5 (brussels sprouts, i586-pc-win32) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:46787 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:46787 I'm using the latest cvs Gnus + XEmacs native win32. When I reply to some French message, the mm-* functions try to guess what encoding is most appropriate. I have traced the behaviour to return most of the times iso-8859-1 and iso-8859-9. Unfortunately, it is not enough for the function `mm-find-mime-charset-region' to convert everything to iso-8859-15. And the message is sent in 2 parts, which is a bit annoying (If I reply using supercite, it can even be split in much more parts, because coding is different for the cited parts and for the ones I'm typing in). So what's wrong ? Should the reply buffer coding system be set to iso-8859-15 or is it xemacs which is wrongly guessing both -9 and -1 (where I suspect -1 only would be ok) ? Thanks for any help, -- Fabrice