From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/56731 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marcus Frings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: PATCH II (for testing only): [Bug, Debian(?)] "g" goes not Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 14:16:24 +0100 Organization: Schismatrix Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: References: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1B2VUj-00087d-00 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 14:17:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1B2VTr-00054q-00; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 07:16:39 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1B2VTh-00054k-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 07:16:30 -0600 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E70CE3A0039 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 07:16:28 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1B2VTf-0002Ql-00 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 14:16:27 +0100 Original-Received: from p508e9b66.dip.t-dialin.net ([80.142.155.102]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 14:16:27 +0100 Original-Received: from protagonist by p508e9b66.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 14:16:27 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 41 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p508e9b66.dip.t-dialin.net X-PGP-Key: 0xE10F502E (DH/DSS) X-PGP-Fingerprint: 53FC 5A87 27BE 1D30 FEB4 861A 948F D6A0 E10F 502E Mail-Copies-To: nobody Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAGFBMVEU2Hi5GNEFpXmt7YVGe lJy1oHzX0tHe2KvXqLySAAACY0lEQVR42l2TwXLiMAyG5UwfwHLSnmPjYa9NTegVjOueW5NyLd1g HoBN8/orJ4FCzQzJ6PMv/bIcMM2uM8vtbDbraQWDMK3lrg+Lut5sdhTvTFXxCXwcQ97UzXb33TfN tsrzUcLAd404LPzHwfgYt3nxssEhDp3p8ubw3Zl5jNFVBnNkkH5vi+7+cNwF7ltEIdfI2Fhjk0Af ntBTTEiZ8gws3LfL/lQodBK1k5JPAgh11/emlsxZH9tBwXmybHzfn5qcZ9E751JoKrJoSBDWPHNO SUSY+mPQPBzD9l8FWjmr+BAa2ftzX/chCRIYYiN4O4bX8AgFxa0EBhdN3ZuOXnzbUpEh1ZTr2NUB OCqlnVJD21P5I80AnnzkDGmNwZxTO4fdG52ro/Q/lQVbA5z6Rx/KlLv8cZRW05mWAxsPbzrBwduf brEHFBYAJflhF8Vzs9yDKQjIpOMX9npa7HNZaGAW0Qp5uSUvPu5ZJRyg0rrVVkyWgSa9gk9lgbm5 jtpqIUegkHorlUXwvo1aabUeARauBE6usnk8OIXqrLBuT/+Zhrv4UVGDLCunGn6V2lKQxdU4v6m4 +ypHwP7+HMcA9j6RobvpRp1BLM/v/FrjR4DDGIBdga/Bd/LokF2du/ef6UGUaXadbK6HEoqA1VKp JM0GgOszoAnTInKXIgLmfAQFfThKCjUpOOhkRlC1g0rXhMGVN6Gocyc53jYvgSZExvAmSrlWNkZS KOT8VrHnMWq61vaXBJwgoyJaebOfHDzE2NIHuL7dTvdO0AdbtFr92g/6O6rZWv2ySswYU4dms61u wv8BFU+AcRuXb64AAAAASUVORK5CYII= X-Now-Playing: In Extremo - "Traubenbett" [Hameln] User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:jJehcAgahCD3rufKbaShnzc6ohk= Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:56731 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:56731 * Kevin Greiner wrote: > I do share your frustration. We're right back to the beginning; my > original patch changed this code -- a change that proved ineffective. :-) I'm not frustrated that much. In fact I really enjoy to help you to fix the bug. > Part of my problem is the lack of hard test data. To that end, I've > written yet another patch :). In this patch, gnus-start has both At this point I would really like to thank you because I deeply appreciate your help in tracking down this bug. > algorithms - the working original and the broken optimization. What's > also different is that I have a debug print on every last line of each > algorithm. > So, here's what I'd like to see. Obviously, install the patch and > recompile gnus. I installed the patch and it compiled fine. > Then start gnus, try to trigger the error (in this version, the old > algorithm takes precidence so the groups will update correctly). Then > switch to the 'kjg' buffer. > Please verify that this buffer contains, at least, one occurrance of > "DISCREPENCY LOCATED". If it does, please send the contents of this > buffer to me. I'll send you the whole content of the buffer in a private mail because I don't want to publish all my groups and mailboxes here but of course you can send your results to the list after analysing the buffer. Regards, Marcus -- "Love for the death and for the defecation Romance and assassination Give me the love of genocide Give me love"