From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9284 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mark Borges Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: [rgnus] FCC in message-mode to nnml group? Date: 07 Jan 1997 13:08:01 -0700 Organization: CIRES, University of Colorado Sender: mdb@cdc.noaa.gov Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149330 17468 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:28:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:28:50 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id MAA32731 for ; Tue, 7 Jan 1997 12:32:42 -0800 Original-Received: from cdc.noaa.gov (manager.Colorado.EDU [128.138.218.210]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Tue, 7 Jan 1997 21:08:09 +0100 Original-Received: from suomi by cdc.noaa.gov (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id NAA02205; Tue, 7 Jan 1997 13:08:05 -0700 Original-Received: by suomi (SMI-8.6) id NAA12676; Tue, 7 Jan 1997 13:08:03 -0700 Original-To: Ding Gnus List X-Attribution: mb Original-Lines: 11 X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.79/XEmacs 19.15 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9284 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9284 Would/could it work? If so, what would the semantics be? (the message would need to be filed to a dynamic numeric filename I suppose). I'd like the reply that I save to be filed in the *same* nnml folder, for threading purposes. Or does everyone just bag FCC: use and instead opt for BCC: or CC:? Finally took the plunge from VM to rgnus for regular email, -- -mb-