From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/6420 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mark Borges Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: gnus-group-post-news Date: 28 May 1996 14:43:59 -0600 Sender: mdb@cdc.noaa.gov Message-ID: References: <1lvihgj2w5.fsf@zagato.visix.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146878 3525 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:47:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:47:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@ifi.uio.no Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id OAA19307 for ; Tue, 28 May 1996 14:21:44 -0700 Original-Received: from cdc.noaa.gov (manager.Colorado.EDU [128.138.218.210]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id ; Tue, 28 May 1996 22:44:55 +0200 Original-Received: from suomi by cdc.noaa.gov (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id OAA20279; Tue, 28 May 1996 14:44:14 -0600 Original-Received: by suomi (SMI-8.6) id OAA24722; Tue, 28 May 1996 14:44:00 -0600 Original-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 28 May 1996 21:40:37 +0200 Original-Lines: 32 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.2.1/XEmacs 19.14 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6420 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6420 >> On 28 May 1996 21:40:37 +0200, >> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen(lars) wrote: lars> Greg Thompson writes: >> now it's going straight into the message composition buffer with the >> group under the point being the one in the Newsgroup header. me >> don't like. how does one get the old behavior back? lars> You can't. However, the Newsgroups line lets you complete over the lars> available group names. Just remove the group and type in the new one, lars> using `TAB' to complete. ...almost. Evidently, you only get to use TAB once (or never, if you have the bad luck to have a *Completions* buffer already), then I run into this: ------------------------------ Signalling: (buffer-read-only #) erase-buffer() message-expand-group() #() call-interactively(message-tab) ------------------------------ Unfortunately when I use TAB completion, 99% fo the time I use it more than once successivley. This is using XEmacs; does GNU Emacs behave differently? -- -mb-