From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/5992 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mark Borges Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: September Gnus 0.75 is released Date: 18 Apr 1996 23:50:56 -0600 Sender: mdb@cdc.noaa.gov Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146513 2056 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:41:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:41:53 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id XAA04719 for ; Thu, 18 Apr 1996 23:22:47 -0700 Original-Received: from cdc.noaa.gov (manager.Colorado.EDU [128.138.218.210]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Fri, 19 Apr 1996 07:52:07 +0200 Original-Received: from roberts by cdc.noaa.gov (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id XAA02659; Thu, 18 Apr 1996 23:52:01 -0600 Original-Received: by roberts (SMI-8.6) id XAA16942; Thu, 18 Apr 1996 23:50:58 -0600 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: Steven L Baur's message of 18 Apr 1996 17:57:03 -0700 Original-Lines: 28 X-Mailer: September Gnus v0.69/XEmacs 19.14 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5992 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5992 >> On 18 Apr 1996 17:57:03 -0700, >> Steven L Baur(s) wrote: ... s> What I see is: (``Date:'' and ``Message-ID:'' are italicized) s> s> Sender: steve@deanna.miranova.com s> To: ding@ifi.uio.no s> Subject: Re: September Gnus 0.75 is released s> References: s> X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/ s> Mail-Copies-To: never s> From: Steven L Baur s> Date: 18 Apr 1996 17:49:37 -0700 s> In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 18 Apr 1996 14:29:47 -0700 s> Message-ID: s> Lines: 1 ^^^^^^^^^? This is slightly off-topic, but lately I've seen more and more posts with a line count of `1' in the summary buffer. Is sgnus keying off this header? Why is it wrong? Does sgnus not update it, or is it some other mail agent's responsibility? I guess I have to re-train myself to not trust it as a indication of message content. -- -mb-