From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/6866 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mark Borges Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Gnus v5.2.24 is released Date: 21 Jun 1996 13:06:01 -0600 Sender: mdb@cdc.noaa.gov Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035147262 5028 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:54:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:54:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , ding@ifi.uio.no Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id MAA21025 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 1996 12:25:34 -0700 Original-Received: from cdc.noaa.gov (manager.Colorado.EDU [128.138.218.210]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id ; Fri, 21 Jun 1996 21:06:24 +0200 Original-Received: from revelle by cdc.noaa.gov (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id NAA11138; Fri, 21 Jun 1996 13:06:04 -0600 Original-Received: by revelle (SMI-8.6) id NAA02551; Fri, 21 Jun 1996 13:06:02 -0600 Original-To: Steven L Baur In-Reply-To: Steven L Baur's message of Fri, 21 Jun 1996 11:00:57 -0700 Original-Lines: 38 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.2.23/XEmacs 19.14 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6866 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6866 >> On Fri, 21 Jun 1996 11:00:57 -0700, >> Steven L Baur(SLB) wrote: >>>>>> "Lars" == Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: Lars> Bug fixes. This is (hopefully) the version of Gnus that will be Lars> included in XEmacs 19.14, unless something *really* serious pops Lars> up the next few hours. So if there's a problem with this Lars> release, get back to me as soon as possible. SLB> This looks much better than 5.2.23. :-) How so? Do you mean the broken gnus-summary-followup-with-original() (bound to `F') in 5.2.23? I just discovered it left Steven off the recipient list, and wanted to send it to someone named Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen ding@ifi.uio.no I don't think it's not an `rmail-dont-reply-to-names' thing, either. Perhaps the abbrev-hacking-next-line that was added to 5.2.23 is involved (just a guess as I don't recall this problem in versions prior to 5.2.23). Anyway, I'll grab 5.2.24 now and see what happens SLB> I don't know why the mailcrypt buffer menu and message mode menu don't SLB> combine, but the only way I can see the message mode buffer menu is to SLB> disable mailcrypt. :-( Is this a bug in how easymenu is being called? I see it (in 5.2.23). But I don't have tm enabled, whereas you do, right? My XEmacs-19.14 menubar in message-mode reads like so: File Edit ... SPARCworks Message Mailcrypt Both menus look complete (too long to type in I mean :-< ). Forgive me. This smiley fascination will soon fade...I just have to try anything I can think of, without offending anyone 8-|. -- -mb-