Re: "widening" a reply

[Matt McClure <matthew.mcclure.es.99@aya.yale.edu>]

On Fri Dec 03 1999, 12:14, Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@iskon.hr> wrote:

> Matt McClure <matthew.mcclure.es.99@aya.yale.edu> writes:
> 
> > On Fri Dec 03 1999, 03:10, Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@iskon.hr> wrote:
> > 
> > > > A sort of `message-insert-wide-to'?  Sure; sounds good to me.
> > > 
> > > Will you be adding it?  I have no idea where to start.
> > 
> > Here's a quick and dirty version that widens the reply.
> 
> It doesn't seem to work for me.  I evaluated your function definition,
> and now I'm composing the response.  When I type
> `M-x message-insert-wide-to', I only get `Cc: ding@gnus.org' added.  A
> real wide reply should also contain `To: Matt McClure <...>', because
> you didn't use Mail-Copies-To or anything like that.

I left that to be handled by message-insert-to.  Otherwise, replying to
a mail message, and subsequently doing message-insert-wide-to would
result in two copies of the original author's address in the To: header.

-- 
Matt
http://www.faradic.net/~mmcclure/