From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/10614 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Justin Sheehy Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Simple feature beg Date: 07 Apr 1997 11:15:53 -0400 Sender: dworkin@ccs.neu.edu Message-ID: References: <199704071324.JAA26876@python.xionics.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.94) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035150455 25386 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:47:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:47:35 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id IAA13586 for ; Mon, 7 Apr 1997 08:39:52 -0700 Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Mon, 7 Apr 1997 17:15:58 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 18031 invoked by uid 504); 7 Apr 1997 15:13:29 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 18028 invoked from network); 7 Apr 1997 15:13:28 -0000 Original-Received: from amber.ccs.neu.edu (root@129.10.111.100) by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 7 Apr 1997 15:13:28 -0000 Original-Received: from garathorm.ccs.neu.edu (dworkin@garathorm.ccs.neu.edu [129.10.112.112]) by amber.ccs.neu.edu (8.8.4/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA14964; Mon, 7 Apr 1997 11:15:54 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (dworkin@localhost) by garathorm.ccs.neu.edu (8.8.4/8.6.4) id LAA13419; Mon, 7 Apr 1997 11:15:53 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: ding@gnus.org, sjm@judgement.com X-Url: http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/dworkin/ In-Reply-To: sjm's message of Mon, 7 Apr 1997 09:24:49 -0400 Original-Lines: 20 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.42/Emacs 19.34 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10614 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10614 sjm writes: > reply on my mailer now gives the address of the sender. I thought the from > line used to be the address of the list. This is correct behavior. Reply should (in the absence of a Reply-To: header) send mail to the originator of a message. 'followup' or 'wide reply' or somesuch thing should go to the list. Of course, if you are using Gnus, all of this quickly becomes intuitive. > Anyway, what does anyone recommend as the correct filter pattern to > match this list? Matching on 'ding' in the 'To: ' or 'Cc: ' headers has always worked fine for me. -Justin