From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/27337 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Justin Sheehy Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: doubling addresses when following up Date: 30 Nov 1999 14:48:24 -0500 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035164379 24006 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:39:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:39:39 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from bart.math.uh.edu (bart.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.48]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA25373 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 1999 14:50:40 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by bart.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAB31869; Tue, 30 Nov 1999 13:49:21 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 30 Nov 1999 13:49:28 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA06001 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 1999 13:49:10 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from amber.ccs.neu.edu (root@amber.ccs.neu.edu [129.10.116.51]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA25358 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 1999 14:48:34 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from betelgeuse.ccs.neu.edu (dworkin@betelgeuse.ccs.neu.edu [129.10.116.100]) by amber.ccs.neu.edu (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA16988 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 1999 14:48:26 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from dworkin@localhost) by betelgeuse.ccs.neu.edu (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id OAA12931; Tue, 30 Nov 1999 14:48:24 -0500 (EST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Vladimir Volovich's message of "24 Nov 1999 10:32:20 +0300" Original-Lines: 20 User-Agent: Gnus/5.070099 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.99) XEmacs/20.4 (Emerald) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:27337 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:27337 Vladimir Volovich writes: > To: someone@domain.com > Reply-To: SomeOne@domain.com Those are probably the same in reality, but could legally be different addresses. > When i followup to this message, gnus puts both addresses (one to To:, > and one to Cc:). But these addresses differ only by case. Do RFCs say > that email addresses are case-insensitive? If so, then gnus should > ignore duplicated emails which differ only by case. Gnus is acting correctly, as it cannot know that those are equivalent. If they are equivalent, then the originator of the message should not have put that Reply-To header in. -Justin