From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9750 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: visigoth@naiad.fac.cs.cmu.edu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Good Netkeeping Seal of Approval (GNKSA) Date: 31 Jan 1997 17:54:17 -0500 Sender: visigoth@naiad.fac.cs.cmu.edu Message-ID: References: <90lu3nzjl8u.fsf@opus.online.no> <0f915bxkwz.fsf@fraxinus.daimi.aau.dk> <0fzpxpfrsi.fsf@fraxinus.daimi.aau.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149724 20269 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:35:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:35:24 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA05569 for ; Fri, 31 Jan 1997 15:08:00 -0800 Original-Received: from naiad.fac.cs.cmu.edu (NAIAD.FAC.CS.CMU.EDU [128.2.191.173]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Fri, 31 Jan 1997 23:54:26 +0100 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: Lars Balker Rasmussen's message of 31 Jan 1997 22:39:25 +0100 Original-Lines: 15 X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.82/Emacs 19.34 Source-Info: Sender is really visigoth@naiad.fac.cs.cmu.edu Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9750 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9750 Lars Balker Rasmussen writes: > Technically, yes, they should just be ignored. But I can't see any > reason they should be allowed in email-addresses, however tyrannical and > paranoid that approach may seem ;) Uh. The question is not should they be allowed, it's "is there any reason not to allow them"? If I mail to "foo@zub.fi", and there's an fi subdomain here at CMU, but I really mean zub.fi (in finland), I should be able to type "foo@zub.fi." to get it. Do you see any reason why this shouldn't be allowed? John.