From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9955
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: visigoth@naiad.fac.cs.cmu.edu
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Decoding QP stuff...
Date: 16 Feb 1997 07:27:41 -0500
Sender: visigoth@naiad.fac.cs.cmu.edu
Message-ID: <vpdn2t53phe.fsf@naiad.fac.cs.cmu.edu>
References: <vpdwwsctkdx.fsf@naiad.fac.cs.cmu.edu> <vafenejlqez.fsf@ls6.informatik.uni-dortmund.de> <vpdn2t6tpw6.fsf@naiad.fac.cs.cmu.edu> <m267ztb1eu.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149903 21568 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:38:23 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:38:23 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
	by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id EAA08916
	for <steve@miranova.com>; Sun, 16 Feb 1997 04:45:32 -0800
Original-Received: from naiad.fac.cs.cmu.edu (NAIAD.FAC.CS.CMU.EDU [128.2.191.173]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <NAA04143@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Sun, 16 Feb 1997 13:27:50 +0100
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 16 Feb 1997 09:28:09 +0100
Original-Lines: 26
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.82/Emacs 19.34
Source-Info: Sender is really visigoth@naiad.fac.cs.cmu.edu
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9955
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9955

Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no> writes:

> That would horribly break threading.

Oh, well.  The ability to have one article be a member of two threads
is theoretically elegant, but as with most such things, won't be
happening Any Time Soon.

A theoretical question: so, what if someone -did- construct such a
references header?  How would Gnus react?

> (setq gnus-parse-headers-hook (list 'gnus-decode-rfc1522))
> This is the default.

It sure is.  I discovered the problem after poking around in the
sources for a while.  I have a habit of starting up Gnus w/o high
ascii (glyphs over 126) turned on--then turn it on when I come across
a place I need it.  I've been too lazy to add this to my .emacs like I
should.  Well, the gnus-summary-display-table gets built when Gnus
starts up, so even though I called (standard-display-european), it
leaves the ?'s in the summary buffer.

I have my fix.

John.