From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/22762 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois_Pinard?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: [patch] choose best looking alternative Date: 22 Apr 1999 17:45:05 -0400 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035160622 31020 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:37:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:37:02 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA00487 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 1999 17:50:15 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAB04233; Thu, 22 Apr 1999 16:46:07 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 22 Apr 1999 16:46:12 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA10408 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 1999 16:46:01 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from degusse.IRO.UMontreal.CA (degusse.IRO.UMontreal.CA [132.204.24.51]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA00354 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 1999 17:45:48 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from trex.IRO.UMontreal.CA (IDENT:pinard@trex.IRO.UMontreal.CA [132.204.26.206]) by degusse.IRO.UMontreal.CA (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA01904 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 1999 17:45:04 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from pinard@localhost) by trex.IRO.UMontreal.CA (8.9.1/8.9.1) id RAA17055; Thu, 22 Apr 1999 17:45:05 -0400 Original-To: GNUS Mailing List X-Face: "b_m|CE6#'Q8fliQrwHl9K,]PA_o'*S~Dva{~b1n*)K*A(BIwQW.:LY?t4~xhYka_.LV?Qq `}X|71X0ea&H]9Dsk!`kxBXlG;q$mLfv_vtaHK_rHFKu]4'<*LWCyUe@ZcI6"*wB5M@[m écrit: > >> An example is this line. It should be in text/enriched, but it's in > >> text/plain. > > How do we know? Both are rendered exactly the same way :-) :-) > That was the point. Actually, did you get the bold in the text/plain part? > In 0.83, I didn't (and neither did paul stevenson). I did not see a difference. But maybe I do not know how to select alternatives for the whole message. I `C-d'ed and looked at each part separately, and they looked alike. I then `C-u g'ed the whole message, to see how it was coded, and then saw the difference. -- François Pinard mailto:pinard@iro.umontreal.ca Join the free Translation Project! http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~pinard