From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/18506 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: fdc@cliwe.ping.de (Frank D. Cringle) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Changing Return-Path Date: 11 Nov 1998 17:06:15 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035157018 6492 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:36:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:36:58 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA01224 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 1998 11:15:09 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAB15034; Wed, 11 Nov 1998 10:14:52 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 11 Nov 1998 10:14:39 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA09311 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 1998 10:14:30 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from lilly.ping.de (qmailr@lilly.ping.de [195.37.120.2]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA01210 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 1998 11:14:12 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (qmail 20842 invoked by uid 10); 11 Nov 1998 16:14:06 -0000 Original-Received: from cliwe.ping.de by lilly.ping.de with UUCP (rmail-0.1-fdc); 11 Nov 1998 16:14:06 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 22798 invoked by uid 150); 11 Nov 1998 16:06:16 -0000 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Anders Melchiorsen's message of "11 Nov 1998 12:48:38 +0100" Original-Lines: 13 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/XEmacs 20.3 - "Vatican City" Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:18506 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:18506 Anders Melchiorsen writes: > What I was wondering was whether the Return-Path: should be my e-mail > address or the account I am posting from (which is unreachable due to > a firewall). If the Return-Path is unreachable due to a firewall, lots of mail servers will reject the mail, whether the recipient is a mailing list or not. Postmasters don't like accepting mail that they won't be able to bounce later if the delivery fails. -- Frank Cringle, fdc@cliwe.ping.de voice: (+49 2304) 467101; fax: 943357