From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/38318 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Kleinpaste Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: '.' at the beginning of summary buffer lines Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 13:47:29 -0400 Message-ID: References: <871ylyiv43.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035174201 21719 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:23:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:23:21 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 21459 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2001 17:47:31 -0000 Original-Received: from mesquite.slip.cs.cmu.edu (HELO cinnamon.vanillaknot.com) (128.2.207.11) by gnus.org with SMTP; 26 Aug 2001 17:47:31 -0000 Original-Received: (from karl@localhost) by cinnamon.vanillaknot.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f7QHlUO12286; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 13:47:30 -0400 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: "5(T0tZd{6}pd~YzBG8O/*EW,.]6]@`m^e;fv65W^Y&=d"M\1H}>T~4_.kcDD.O~y3k)a6 hR;Nmi>9|>Nm${2IpM0^RcUEa\jcq?KOP)C&~x51l~zCHTulL^_T|u0I^kB'z@]{`2YjQu In-Reply-To: (Henrik Enberg's message of "Sun, 26 Aug 2001 19:36:50 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) XEmacs/21.4 (Artificial Intelligence) Original-Lines: 22 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38318 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38318 Florian Weimer wrote: >> I think I've read about it here, but I can't find the message, and it >> doesn't seem to be documented in the manual. Henrik Enberg writes: > It means that you haven't seen those articles before. It's extremely inconsistent. Here is my summary buffer for ding, in Oort as of this morning: R 26-Aug > [ 5: Florian Weimer ] '.' at the beginning of summary buffer lines R 26-Aug `---> [ 15: Henrik Enberg ] 26-Aug [ 38: Kai Großjohann ] Re: *Server* buffer problems when adding server parameters 26-Aug [ 11: Raymond Scholz ] Re: self contained nnfolder 26-Aug > [ 35: Rob Browning ] Re: self-contained nnml 26-Aug `---> [ 28: Simon Josefsson ] No `.' at all. But I surely hadn't seen any of these articles before. It seems like a nice feature, but I can't figure out what it's really supposed to be telling me, if it doesn't show up when it obviously ought to.