From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/19898 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Kleinpaste Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Mime-Version and no Content-Type Date: 16 Dec 1998 09:04:43 -0500 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035158164 13946 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:56:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:56:04 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA19818 for ; Wed, 16 Dec 1998 09:07:54 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAB17254; Wed, 16 Dec 1998 08:05:34 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 16 Dec 1998 08:05:40 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA01897 for ; Wed, 16 Dec 1998 08:05:28 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from beaver.jprc.com (BEAVER.JPRC.COM [207.86.147.217]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA19681 for ; Wed, 16 Dec 1998 09:05:19 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from karl@localhost) by beaver.jprc.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id JAA07944; Wed, 16 Dec 1998 09:04:44 -0500 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: "5(T0tZd{6}pd~YzBG8O/*EW,.]6]@`m^e;fv65W^Y&=d"M\1H}>T~4_.kcDD.O~y3k)a6h R;Nmi>9|>Nm${2IpM0^RcUEa\jcq?KOP)C&~x51l~zCHTulL^_T|u0I^kB'z@]{`2YjQu In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "16 Dec 1998 14:40:04 +0100" User-Agent: Gnus/5.070066 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.66) XEmacs/20.4 (Emerald) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Original-Lines: 7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:19898 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:19898 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > ...should have neither of these headers actually included, since > they are the default values and carry no information. (But I'm > unable to see where RFC2045 says this right now -- did I imagine it?) Not exactly. I don't recall it in 2045 specifically, but it is definitely present elsewhere, e.g., in Spencer's son-of-1036.