From: Karl Kleinpaste <karl@jprc.com>
Subject: Re: 5.4.13 and virtual servers
Date: 02 Mar 1997 18:27:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <vxk9145g9i6.fsf@pocari-sweat.jprc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 01 Mar 1997 00:26:35 +0100
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no> writes:
> It shouldn't, but it might if there's (wow!) a bug in the new function
> that compares servers. Let's see... Find two groups created in this
> manner (that use the same server), and pick out the select methods
> with `G e' on the two groups. Then do
> (gnus-server-get-method GROUP METHOD)
> an both these groups (with their server) and see what it says. It
> should ideally return the same method for both groups.
OK, I picked on my local INN-hackery server's instance of
news.admin.{misc,technical}. I know they cause distinct server opens
due to *Message-Log*:
Opening nntp server on localhost+nntp+localhost:news.admin.misc...
Opening nntp server on localhost+nntp+localhost:news.admin.technical...
`G e' for both groups returns an edit-form buffer with this content:
(nntp "localhost"
(nntp-address "localhost"))
Then executing, e.g.,
(gnus-server-get-method "news.admin.misc"
'(nntp "localhost" (nntp-address "localhost"))
returns in the minibuffer:
(nntp "localhost" (nntp-address "localhost"))
(Seems kinda redundant, but I think that's what you wanted.)
Identical responses for both. One would presume they compare as
equivalent. Um...unless they don't use the string= function? Um,
gnus-server-get-method calls get-server-to-method, and there it loops
through the opened servers, looking for a match with `equal' rather
than `string='. Is this the problem?
> > If so, how and why does this differ from `G m' creation?
> `G m group RET server RET'. So it's would be less typing in the long
> run.
I suppose I didn't ask the question very precisely.
Obviously, I can type X characters to create a group via `G m', or I
can type Y characters via entry to server mode, poke around the group
list, and subscribe those I like.
What I'm wondering is whether two groups defined only via `G m' would
have some relevant server difference indicated in the forms one finds
in .newsrc.eld, or whether a group selected via server-mode would
differ from one defined via `G m', assuming that the names typed (etc)
are the same.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-03-02 23:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-02-17 20:08 Sudish Joseph
1997-02-18 1:51 ` Sudish Joseph
1997-02-20 2:05 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
1997-02-20 15:00 ` Karl Kleinpaste
1997-02-23 23:06 ` Felix Lee
1997-02-24 0:21 ` Paul Franklin
1997-02-28 20:40 ` Albrecht Kadlec
1997-02-28 23:28 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
1997-02-28 23:26 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
1997-03-02 23:27 ` Karl Kleinpaste [this message]
1997-03-03 5:30 ` David Moore
1997-03-05 8:12 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
1997-03-05 12:17 ` Karl Kleinpaste
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=vxk9145g9i6.fsf@pocari-sweat.jprc.com \
--to=karl@jprc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).